MyBrokerVault → Prop Firm Comparisons → FTMO vs FundedNext

FTMO vs FundedNext 2026

Two of the most popular forex prop firms head to head. We break down every difference — evaluation cost, rules, profit splits, and which is actually better for your trading style.

⚡ Quick Answer

Choose FTMO if you want the most trusted name in forex prop with a decade of track record, the highest max funding ($400K), and payout reliability that's second to none. Choose FundedNext if you want a lower evaluation cost, a more beginner-friendly structure, and the unique Stellar evaluation model with a profit share during the challenge phase.

FTMO vs FundedNext — Full Comparison

CategoryFTMOFundedNext
Established2015 (10+ years)2022 (3 years)
Max Account Size$400,000$200,000
Profit SplitUp to 90%Up to 95%
Evaluation Steps2 Phases1 or 2 Phases
Profit Target (P1)10%8% (lower)
Daily Loss Limit5%5%
Max Drawdown10%10%
Time LimitNoneNone
Profit During EvalNoYes (Stellar model)
Fee RefundFirst payoutFirst payout
Payout Speed1-3 days1-5 days
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTraderMT4, MT5
News TradingAllowedAllowed
EA / Algo TradingAllowedAllowed
US TradersNot acceptedNot accepted
Track Record★★★★★ (10 years)★★★★ (3 years)

Why Choose FTMO

FTMO's primary advantage is trust built over a decade. When you're giving a prop firm evaluation fee money — potentially $500+ — the firm's track record matters enormously. FTMO has paid out to 100,000+ funded traders without a documented pattern of withheld payouts. That consistency is worth paying a premium for.

The $400K maximum funding is also unmatched in the forex prop space. For traders with consistent performance who want to scale, FTMO's scaling plan can take you from $100K to $400K through consecutive profitable months — something FundedNext's $200K cap doesn't allow.

For the most experienced traders, cTrader support gives access to a more professional execution environment than MT4/MT5, particularly for scalpers and algorithmic traders.

Why Choose FundedNext

FundedNext's most interesting feature is the Stellar evaluation model — where you keep 15% of profits earned during the challenge phase itself, before you're even funded. If you hit your profit target and earn $5,000 in the process, you pocket $750 regardless of whether you continue. FTMO offers nothing equivalent.

FundedNext's evaluation fees are generally lower than FTMO for equivalent account sizes, and their 8% Phase 1 profit target (vs FTMO's 10%) means the challenge is marginally easier to pass. For newer traders who struggle with the 10% target, this matters.

The 95% profit split on some account types is the highest available from a major prop firm — though it applies to specific account models and conditions.

Which Should You Choose?

Choose FTMO If...
  • Track record and payout reliability are your top priority
  • You want access to more than $200K in capital
  • You use cTrader or algorithmic strategies requiring best execution
  • You're experienced and confident hitting a 10% target
Choose FundedNext If...
  • You want to earn during the evaluation phase itself (Stellar model)
  • Lower evaluation fees matter to your budget
  • An 8% profit target fits your typical trading style better
  • You want a slightly more flexible evaluation structure

For most traders, FTMO is the safer choice — the trust premium is worth it. But FundedNext is genuinely competitive and growing rapidly, and the Stellar model is innovative enough that it deserves serious consideration.

Start Your FTMO Challenge

Up to $400K funding, 90% split, fee refunded on first payout. The gold standard of forex prop trading.

Start FTMO Challenge →
⚠ Affiliate disclosure: This comparison page contains affiliate links to FTMO and FundedNext. MyBrokerVault may earn a commission if you sign up through our links, at no extra cost to you. All reviews are based on independent research.